What is Movie 43?
It’s a series of short films not really strung together by
anything. The film is vile,
vulgar, amateurish and stupid but boy did I laugh. I laughed hard.
If you like your comedies smart, with heart, with a deeper meaning and
not riddled with toilet humor, then go and see something else. This is a film that isn’t afraid to go
overboard and stay floating in the water and it isn’t afraid to make you feel
bad for laughing at it. This is a
balls to the walls, or face if that’s how you like it, comedy that lays its cards
right out on the table within the first five minutes.
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Friday, January 25, 2013
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Silver Linings Playbook Review
Some minor SPOILERS below:
Everyone
knows about Silver Linings Playbook so far and has been on the minds and hearts
of the Academy and fans. I knew
the basic premise of the film before going in and I knew what the film was
nominated for but I decided to not to think about that while viewing it or by
writing this review. I can say
that the film is a slow build with some dragging parts but as a whole this film
is magnificent. With comedy melded
together with heartbreak, mental illness, drama, and romance, this film is
something that should be viewed and enjoyed. It’s a good time at the movies and you’ll leave the film feeling warm
and joyful.
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Zero Dark Thirty Review
In the running for Oscar gold, this latest film by Kathryn Bigelow will have people talking . Zero Dark Thirty is about the near-decade long hunt for UBL (Usama bin Laden). The film follows Jessica Chastain who plays Maya, a CIA op who is hellbent on finding UBL. The film is littered with controversial scenes but I'm not here to talk to you about how these scenes are controversial, nor am I here to picket the film because of the scenes of torture. Like I've said before, I'm just here to tell you if the movie is worth watching. Zero Dark Thirty (ZDT) is a terrific film to watch.Gangster Squad Review
Like the desert at the end of a four-course meal, Gangster Squad is nothing but empty calories for the eyes. The film is fun and is a blast to sit through with a fist full of popcorn and a mouth filled with soda but the film shouldn't be taken seriously as a great drama but rather a great Summer action film. The film doesn't try to make it seem like it's something more than a mindless good time at the movies and that's what it so much more enjoyable. Forget that the film is inspired by true events and you, too, will have a fun time at the movies. Thursday, January 3, 2013
Introducing A Movie Club For You and Me
Did I watch those films before the end of the year? No, I
didn’t and I feel a bit ashamed. I
did watch two films and feel slightly better about myself because of it but
still, I feel like I let you guy’s down.
However, I’ve come up with a solution to fix that problem and to become
much more interactive with my fan base.
Introducing the LazyDog Films Club. You don’t have to sign up for anything, which is the best
part. I’ll post up a schedule of
which film I’m going to see next and I will write a review and post a video on
YouTube. You can watch the films
along with me to have an open discussion about the film, the acting, direction,
cinematography, writing, and even fan theories.
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Django Unchained Review
Django Unchained
Starring Jamie Foxx, Christoph Waltz, Kerrie Washington, Samuel L. Jackson, and Leonardo DiCaprio. Directed by Quentin Tarantino
Amid plenty of controversy over the use of a certain word,
Quentin Tarantino’s Spaghetti Western, Southern Revenge flick, Django
Unchained, has finally seen the light of day. Riddled with plenty of homages to the genre films of yesteryear,
I could talk about each reference for days, just like any Tarantino film but I
don’t have days nor am I a film historian. I could talk to you about how this film symbolizes Tarantino
himself as a filmmaker in the industry, which is a great theory but I would
need a day or two to gather my thoughts, but I’d rather talk to you about how
great of a film Django Unchained is.
It’s not just great, it’s one of the best films in his catalog.
Django tells the tale of a slave turned Bounty Hunter
trained by a German Dentist, or Bounty Hunter whichever Dr. Schultz prefers, to
locate three slave owners. When
the job is done, Schultz agrees to accompany Django to rescue and free his wife
from Calvin Candie, a wealthy plantation owner and Mandingo fighting
owner. Let’s just say that things
go from crazy to a helluva lot worse over the course of thirty minutes, though
the film clocks in at about 2 and a half hours; yep, it’s that intense. Friday, May 4, 2012
The Avengers Film Review
Movie Review: The Avengers
After five years and five films including two Iron Man
films, The Incredible Hulk, Captain America and Thor, the day has finally
arrived where we would enjoy the likes of each superhero together in one 2 and
a half hour film. The Avengers has
hit theaters today and is predicted to earn a massive amount of dough, possibly
becoming the biggest debut for a film, ever. That is actually very likely. But I’m not here to tell you about numbers, that’s my other
job, I’m here to tell you if the movie is good or not – SPOILER ALERT – it
is. Tuesday, March 27, 2012
The Hunger Games Review
With months of people ecstatic to see how Gary Ross could depict the world of Panem on screen, we were finally treated to see how it was possible. Fans of the book, The Hunger Games, bought their tickets just four weeks in advanced to prepare themselves for the ride of watching Katniss Everdeen compete in the 74th Annual Hunger Games. People like me on the other hand, stood idly by watching as nearly everyone from 10 year old kids to 80 year old grandparents were psyching themselves up for the film adaptation. Three weeks ago, I finally got off my lazy ass and decided to read the book to see what all the hype was about. To my very unexpected surprise, I very much enjoyed reading it (ugh, I know, reading is boring. But if you don’t read, how are you ever going to know what my opinions are, *sad face*). I have to say, spoiler alert, I actually very much enjoyed this film just as much as I enjoyed the book.
The film opens up to some title cards setting up the environment of Panem and the hunger games, themselves. Panem is broken up in thirteen districts, the thirteenth of which was wiped completely out due to a civil war between the people of the district and the Capital, the black heart of Panem running the show. The Hunger Games are a televised, gladiator-like event that pits 24 children, a boy and a girl from each of the remaining twelve districts, in a fight to the death; they were then set forth to show that the Capital still reigns supreme.
We follow Katniss Everdeen, a young 16 hunter who is protective of her sister and must try to make ends meet for her family. She is then forced to step up as a “contestant” for the hunger games when her younger sister is chosen to compete. This is where the film kicks off, both story wise and action wise. I won’t go much more into detail with the synopsis because you probably seen it already, it made over $155 million dollars so far.
Jennifer Lawrence is superb as her rendition of Katniss. Her character is a great heroine that is both fierce and vulnerable and we can get somewhat of a sense of that. When she needs to ferocious, she is, and when she’s at her most vulnerable, we can get of sense of that but I never really felt she was. Emotionally speaking that is.
Josh Hutcherson as Peeta was a bit confusing. Walking out of the theater I felt he did a great job but thinking about it a few days later, I felt was just okay. I felt he was stiff, second-guessing himself in every scene. I mean, I would second-guess myself if my co-star was Jennifer Lawrence. Not only is she beautiful but it would be kind of hard to match her acting chops. Watching Hutcherson, it was like watching a race between a Porsche and an G6. Both are really good modes of transportation but they aren’t in the same class.
I felt as though Gary Ross, the director did a great job of conveying the world of Panem and the districts without going too overboard or without under selling it. District 12, in the film, felt like this desolate piece of land where the inhabitants were starving and the people felt overworked. Then they show the Capital and how rich everything looks. The colors ooze off screen, the city is bright and vibrant, and the people look well fed and underworked. The contrast between the two was done so brilliantly and sometimes subtly; people in District 12, most notably Katniss’ mother, is watching the games through a projector while the television in the Capital is set up on a glass window.
Now it’s time for me to compare between the book and the film. The film lacked any of the real emotional bonds between characters. Potential Spoilers Ahead, Katniss’ and Rue’s relationship in the book is much more fleshed out and you could really feel their bond to one another. The film treats it as a short encounter that lasts roughly 10 minutes of screen time. I would have loved if the film explored that subplot a little but further, maybe another 10 or 15 minutes would have sufficed. Also, the relationship between Katniss and Peeta felt a bit rushed here. I got the sense that he loved her but her not him but I truly felt that their was a huge hole missing for me. In the film, it really feels like Katniss and Haymitch are truly more of an enemy to Peeta as the Capital. They play him for a fool and it results with him being alive but at the cost of potentially a broken heart.
Another gripe I had with the film was the use of handycam. Most of the scenes in the arena are very hard to follow as I had a hard time trying to figure out what was happening. The use of the shaky cam was intended on giving the more gruesome deaths in the book a jarring approach in the film without sacrificing an R rating, but it was nauseating.
A side to the film that was absent from the film was the gamemakers full interaction with the arena and the President’s full intentions. This was a welcome addition as it gave those who didn’t read the book a better understanding of motives of the Capital without having to relay on boring narrations from the main character. With this added material, you get a better understanding of how much of a threat the Capital really is and you have a face you can relate to the Capital to.
The film’s running time is about two and a half hours but it doesn’t really feel like it. The film is paced magnificently and the intensity of the world is captured well on film. Some minor gripes with the film that prevent it from becoming a masterpiece are character relationships, Josh Hutcherson’s acting, and handycam work. All in all, the film is great but some minor thing hold it back from going down in history as one of the greatest films ever, but it will or, rather, should go down as the one of the greatest film adaptation of a book.
4.5 stars*
*Graphic coming soon
Sunday, July 10, 2011
'Horrible Bosses' Review
There has been sort of a drought of comedies since the release of Apatow produced Bridesmaids hit theaters in May. Bridesmaids was a hit, not only with critics but with audiences. After its release we’ve seen lackluster ‘funny’ films such as Bad Teacher, Hangover Part 2, Larry Crowne and Monte Carlo. Seth Gordon hopes to reverse the trend of stupid comedies with the release of Horrible Bosses.
The film opens up with narration from Nick Hendricks (Jason Bateman) describing how he can become successful, unlike his grandmother who he says “didn’t take shit” and died poor because of it.
Sunday, June 12, 2011
Super 8 Review
JJ Abrams has done it again. His last film, Star Trek, was a sensation that was virtually unparalleled to any other film that was released that year but was probably overlooked because of Avatar, released later that year. Super 8 first trailer was shot way before the film finished its script and ever since then the hype started. What is this mystery film produced by Steven Spielberg and directed by JJ Abrams? With a marketing ploy that stayed clear away from revealing any big spoilers, the film finally released and is a breath of fresh air; staying away from the buff action hero, the sexy yet somehow smart heroine, or the huge set pieces set in exotic places that are home to explosions.
Super 8 takes place in 1979 and opens after a funeral. Joe, played by Joel Courtney, is distraught from the accidental death of his mother at the local steel mill. Joe, distraught sits outside on the swing set while everyone in town gossips about what happens next. Joe’s friends Charles, Martin, Preston, and Carey discuss what the body looked like and whether her head was crushed or not. This conversation sets up the entire films tone; never taking itself too seriously.
Sunday, June 5, 2011
X-Men: First Class Review
Is it safe to say to that right after X-2, the X-Men films has taken a turn for the worst? X-Men: The Last Stand was awful and X-Men Origins: Wolverine was not too far behind. But, does X-Men: First Class follow the banter of the last two films or can the film be worthy enough to be mentioned along the first and second films? I was skeptical about First Class when I saw the first trailer late last year. I thought, "This looks like X-Men Evolution." Well, when I walked out of the theater I felt different.
The film opens up in Poland in 1944 at a German concentration camp with a twelve year old Erik Lensherr being separated from his mother by Nazis. After seeing that he could manipulate metal, Erik is called to see Dr. Schmidt or Shaw (Kevin Bacon). Schmidt bullies Erik into trying to move a Nazi quarter and threatening to kill his mother as incentive. Erik, who is desperately trying to move the coin, watches as his mother is shot and he goes ballistic, moving everything metal around the room. Meanwhile, in Westchester, NY, a 12-year-old Xavier awakens to Raven (Mystique) raiding through his refrigerator. A friendship is then bonded between them that at first seems to last.
Friday, June 3, 2011
The Hangover Part 2 Review
If you loved the first ‘Hangover’ film like I did, you were probably excited for the sequel like everyone else in the world. There’s a saying, “if it isn’t broke, don’t fix it”; it works well for video games, why won’t it work for films? The Hangover Part 2 is the same exact film as its predecessor with Stu taking the place of Doug as the groom-to-be, a monkey taking the place of baby Carlos, and a monk as the stolen lion. Stu is getting married to Lauren (Jamie Chung) in her parents native homeland of Thailand, and don’t worry, the rest of the Wolf Pack is back including Alan, Phil, and Doug including Mr. Chow who steals the majority of the laughs. The gang, just like in the first one, celebrates the bachelor party and end up blacking out and wake up the next day hung-over with no recognition of what happened the night before. The film is bigger, more vulgar, but not better. The first film was dark humored but was enough to handle. The second, however, is too dark to laugh at. If Todd Philips thinks that we could laugh at death and drug overdose, then he is surely mistaken. Zach Galifianakis is typecast as the overweight man-child who may or may not have mental health issues. His character seems to be a bit more demented and comes off as a murderer with the mentality of a four-year-old boy. Bradley Cooper is nothing special, he’s the one trying to keep everything under control and Ed Helms is trying to keep it cool but is overwhelmed with the knowledge of what happened to him. I will not give anything more away. The vulgarity is heightened and the nudity is doubled; it feels as though Todd Phillips tried to one up the original but falls very short in doing so. Nick Cassavetes as the tattoo artist is entertaining to watch but those who don’t know who he is will think nothing more. Bryan Callen, who plays the chapel owner in the first, reappears as a strip club owner. All in all, The Hangover Part 2 is much of the same film as the first with few laughs in the beginning. Ken Jeong steals the laughs as Mr. Chow.
3 out of five stars.
Kung Fu Panda 2 Review
Nine, count them, nine sequels have been released this year, so far, and not too many of them have been great with the exception of Scream 4 and Fast Five. I think Kung Fu Panda 2 qualifies in those ranks. Kung Fu Panda 2 takes place right after the first. Po is “training”, trying to fit 40 dumplings in his mouth. The film opens up with the legend of Shen, a peacock whose fortune was he would be defeated by a foe who is black and white. Shen then leads his army of wolves to kill China’s panda population. When Shen returns to his village, his family banishes him for such an evil deed. Shen goes into exile, stealing metal from shop-owners to create a kung-fu killing cannon turret. Po must defeat Shen while learning the peace within himself as well as learning the truth about his family. The film isn’t as good as the first film but it is as entertaining with some of the coolest action sequences of the year, superior to that of Thor if you can believe that. Kung Fu Panda 2 does its job of making you laugh and entertaining you. Jack Black owns the character of Po and Gary Oldman is great as the voice of Shen. Jackie Chan, Seth Rogen, David Cross, and Lucy Liu bring enjoyment with little quips here and there. Angelina Jolie’s character, Tigress, has a bigger role than in the last film as Po’s friend who helps him along his journey. There isn’t much wrong with this film but the story does drag and does hurt the film because it does run at 94 minutes. The ending is great, especially the cliffhanger for a third film, which, personally, I am excited for.
3 1/2 Wuxi finger holds out of 5.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




